11/14/2023 0 Comments Silverfast vuescan comparison![]() It might get down to a question of what you prefer. What I personally think you are going to find is that each package is going to yield a fairly decent result, with some differences that can probably attributed to differences in the programs. Less sure with Epson Scan, I haven't used it in several years. I am reasonably sure that it can be accomplished with Silverfast and Lasersoft, since I have used them both. The above might give you some idea on the basic differences between each software package. Something like Adobe RGB (1998) available on each. * Color Space - not sure on this one, but you should have * USM application in PS or PSE with same on each image That shouldn't have to adjust it for what you are attempting. * Curve-With the image you have I would make the case * Mid-point, or mid-level brightness- identical on each VueScan can make 16-bit files while SilverFast can make only 8-bit files and VueScan files are 108 MB per photo whereas SilverFast gives 54 MB. * black and white points - just bring them in far enough to * film profile - same on each, may not be possible So possibly you could do it by just concentrating on the basics. Having said all that, I would expect that trying to replicate identical settings between each package would a bit probable at best. You really want to be able to control your test by setting up the scan variables so that they are as close to being the same for the three programs as can achieve. So it is mainly a matter of taste.I think the problem that you encounter with using the program's 'auto' settings, or 'basic' settings, is that you are getting a result that is predicated on a programmer's ideas on how the image should appear. I did comparisons using Lightroom Classic 10.1. To see the effects of the Kodachrome setting in each program, I scanned a roll of Kodachrome slides with both Kodachrome and Ektachrome or regular positive settings, with 48 bit TIFF output. In the end it is not what is better or best, but you think it best suits the photo. Ive been evaluating both Silverfast and Vuescan to use with my Nikon 5000 ED scanner. It doesn’t make although a world of difference. The intervention of NegativeLabPro makes the colors appear a bit more neutral, more sharp and more contrasting. Scanning negatives with the built-in color profiles, adding sharpness goes well in both packages and with Silverfast also a bit faster. Both Epsonscanner and Silverfast have excellent solutions for this, but only for the TIFF variants. What certainly does not work are the RAW files with no possibility of improving dust, scratches and dirt on the negatives. But straight from the scanner, the negafix for me does not set the light right, the colors although seem fairly accurate. Of course this can be edited in Silverfast or other editors. Negative scan with Negafix Kodak Portra 160Īlthough these are fascinating scans, the light does not reflect the actual situation as I remember it, it looks too dark.In both cases we used Digital Ice.įinally what about just scanning with Silverfast? Each upper photo, the negative is scanned as positive (without Epson’s color profile, without added sharpness) and in Lightroom as TIFF converted to positive with NegativeLabPro. In the three examples, the bottom photo in each slider set are the result of a ‘normal’ negative scan, with Epson controlling the sharpness and colors (2400 Dpi). But most of all, Digital Ice technology completes the software because it reduces dust, scratches and stains to a minimum. Many settings are available to adjust sharpness and colors. Background: I've been pretty satisfied with Vuescan the last few years. I just want some opinions from users of Silverfast. First we show you three examples of working with the Epson Scansoftware that comes with the scanner.Īs discussed earlier, this software is very suitable for making high-quality scans. 1 Posted Febru(edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm considering the hitherto unthinkable: switching from Vuescan to Silverfast. We did however not use VueScan for our review, since Silverfast is in our opinion upfront more versatile software. In addition, all packages work together with the (separately to purchase) plugin for Lightroom, NegativeLabPro. It will take care of all the required operations completely on its own. The most commonly used software packages are Epson Scan, VueScan and Silverfast. This VueScan free alternative grants full control over scanners, even network scanners, cameras or acquisition cards within a single click. Earlier we reviewed the V600, an excellent entry-level scanner, but in order to also work with large format negatives, we have to upgrade to the 7 or 8 series. For our examples, we use the Epson Perfection V850. ![]() After our earlier article on scan software, requests came in to also show some examples of the differences between Epson, Silverfast and in conjunction with Negativelabpro plugin for Adobe Lightroom. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |